Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Blogger Question for Blogspot Users!

KDDR has languished for a year or more now, largely because I find the Blogger interface obstructive.

There are two important things that I can't figure out:

  1. Adding images to links. Several of the blogs I read regularly include neatly-formatted thumbnails that you can click to link to a larger image. I can't even get a simple [img src="URL"] to work.

  2. The equivalent of the "LJ Cut". Those few of you who've actually perused my dusty and neglected blog know that I tend to... ramble at length. I'd like to learn the secret of (More...) in Blogspot syntax, to spare casual readers the effort of paging through my purple prose when they're looking for a particular entry. Spoiler protection would also be apprecated, I'm sure.



Any hints or help from the more experienced of you?

LEGACY 2020: General Premise.

(This was originally written back in November of 2006 -- two days shy of a year ago, actually -- in the first flush of the L2020 concept. The campaign concept lost steam, so I didn't post it at the time. Now, however, it looks like the game will be played after all -- and looking it over, I can present this unchanged.)

----

First, the boilerplate:
LEGACY 2020 is a proposal for a superhero role-playing campaign set in a world in which superheroes emerged in the early 20th Century, then aged in real time, interacting with each other and the world around them, having children and grandchildren and passing on their legacies. This project is for personal amusement, and in no way is intended to violate the intellectual property rights of the creators and copyright holders.

And now, the details:

Unlike Mr. Allston, I'm not brave enough to incorporate every comic-book superhero into a single world. For one thing, it would be horrifically cluttered; for another, it wouldn't leave me any material for the inevitable cross-time crises that are a staple of the genre.

Instead, the L2020 project will be an alternate DC Universe. If Marvel was once "The House Of Ideas", DC has long been "The House of Legacies". DC characters pass their titles, powers, or simply callings on to successors. They do so in the "mainstream continuity", and have done so for half a century. They also have a precedent for masterful re-interpretations of their characters in "Elseworlds", exploring how stories could be retold and reintegrated in hindsight, if they had, in fact, been subject to the tides of time and change.

In other words, DC has a rich vein of material to plunder.

Of course, the idea of an "alternate DC universe" is in itself no simple matter. DC is, after all, the Borg of the Comics World, assimilating other comics companies and adding their biological and technological distinctiveness to their own -- and this tendency extends back to the earliest origins of the company.

The characters currently considered part of the "Mainstream DC Universe" include:

1. Characters from National Allied Publications, Detective Comics, Inc., and All-American Publications.
2. The Quality Comics stable, acquired by National Periodicals in 1956.
3. The Fawcett Comics characters, licensed by DC in 1972 and purchased outright in 1980.
4. The Charlton Comics superheroes, acquired in 1983.
5. Characters created by various DC licensees who were absorbed, back-licensed, or outright appropriated for the comics -- the appearance of the Wonder Twins in Extreme Justice, for example.
6. Some, but not all, of the characters appearing under the "Vertigo" imprint -- primarily those who originated in the "Mainstream DCU"."

They're all fair game for L-2020, and I'll try to use as many as I can -- though I have no intention of rewriting the history of every character.

Also "fair game" are characters who have lapsed into the Public Domain, including characters from such long-defunct publishers as Nedor and Centaur. I won't make an effort to include their extensive stables into the Legacy "mainstream", but I will draw upon them to fill the occasional hole in the timeline.

The core premise of the L-2020 Campaign is that characters make their public debut in the same year that their features debuted in our timeline, and age normally thereafter. Of course, there are exceptions:

1. "Aging normally" is relative. Alien physiologies, magical creations, and life-extending technologies and side-effects will benefit certain individuals, though no exploding supervillains will bestow extended lifespans on entire super-teams.
2. Characters set in historical time periods are, of course, still set in those time periods... as intriguing as the notion of Jonah Hex as a scarred Viet Nam vet in 1972 might be.
3. Characters who began in relative obscurity but later achieved far greater prominence may have their debuts and timelines adjusted to put them in the "proper" period. This could include Green Arrow and Animal Man.
4. Introduction dates for characters closely associated with other, more prominent characters may be adjusted to better fit the "primary" character's timelines.
5. Characters introduced into other characters' backstories by later writers may be introduced at their "retcon point", at the actual publication date of their debut, or not at all.

Needless to say, relationships between characters will often change, frequently enough to be considered the rule instead of the exception. Cousins may become offspring. Children may become grandchildren. Entirely new characters will certainly show up.

I Am Not A Number!

Last week, the scans_daily community on LiveJournal posted the extant pages of Jack Kirby's unpublished version of The Prisoner.

I love the opening on the first page:

In this age, when the individual can find himself at the mercy of advanced technology welded by an organized and ruthless enemy, THIS BOOK BECOMES IMPORTANT TO ALL OF US!!!

That's something Your Obedient Serpent has said for decades, now: McGoohan's eccentric experiment is an invaluable survival guide to anyone living in the (post)modern world. And Jack just comes right out and says it: this comic book is important. No "subtle themes" or "hidden messages" for Kirby. If he thought something was important, he'd SHOUT IT TO THE HEAVENS, in boldfaced italics.

Somehow, he made it work. Which is why we call him "The King".

And this, dear reader, is why it stokes Your Obedient Serpent's ire to hear Starlin and his sycophants expound on how Jack "never really said" what the Anti-Life Equation was. What they MEAN is, "we never read The Forever People." Kirby wasn't at all mysterious about the Equation: he explicitly spells it out (and yes, in boldfaced italics) over and over -- but he does it in the pages of what too many people consider the goofiest, most dated, most embarrassing installment of the Fourth World saga.

Your Obedient Serpent, on the other claw, read Jimmy Olsen, Mister Miracle, and The Forever People when they came out. New Gods, however, didn't cross my path until almost a decade later, thanks to a friend who dragged me to his college library's restricted-access collection of classic comics, specifically so I could catch up on those chapters of the Fourth World that I'd missed.

Perhaps that skews my perceptions of the Great Unfinished Work. Through the '80s, New Gods was reprinted several times, but the other threads of the saga were neglected until their black-and-white collections from a few years back and the wonderful, wonderful Fourth World Omnibus volumes currently being released. New Gods is grand, sweeping, epic, and bombastic -- but I think it's also the Fourth World title that explains the least about the actual philosophical struggles involved.

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Viva Oracle!

This was originally posted as a response to Ragnell's post about Booster Gold #4, which ends with the surprise reveal that Barbara Gordon's crippling and subsequent career as Oracle happened because of the Bad Guy Time Travellers and their plot to thwart the origins of the whole Justice League -- including their "rightful" leader, Batgirl.

I love this idea, and I can't wait to see how it plays out... but until I read the comments in Ragnell's post, it never occurred to me that DC would actually have Booster and Rip succeed in "fixing" that one.

Frankly, I think they'd be damned foolish to consider it.

I can't consider Oracle a "mistake" on DC's part. Barbara Gordon as Oracle is a far more interesting, original character than Barbara Gordon ever was as the Earth-One Betty Kane, introduced to bolster the sagging ratings of a campy TV show that most fans would rather forget.

She's a more successful character, too. Her tenure as Oracle (1989-2007) is just three years shy of her tenure as Batgirl (1967-1988). At this stage, her Batgirl career was faltering; one reason Moore was allowed to treat her so cavalierly was because the character has simply failed to find a niche. She had never broken out of back-up series and Special Guest Sidekick appearances. The closest thing she'd gotten to a "team" was as a tagger-on to the Dynamic Duo. In the stories, Barbara was wondering if she was really making a difference as a crime-fighter, if she might do more good by directing her talents elsewhere.

At least one person has said that they want to see Barbara resume the Batgirl role because Oracle, the "Superhero OnStar", "makes things too easy" for other DCU characters, and writers tend to use her as a crutch. To Your Obedient Serpent, this almost qualifies for the Women in Refrigerators List: impose a major life change to a female character to produce a desired effect on a male character.

I keep hearing people object to the creation of Oracle because of the Fridge Listing of Barbara Gordon in The Killing Joke. Sure, Babs's crippling is classic Fridge List material. That was Alan Moore's script -- and while it set the stage for the introduction of Oracle, it was NOT her origin.

Barbara Gordon's recreation of herself as the Oracle was the work of John Ostrander, and it was as far from the Fridge List as you can get. It pulled the character out of the shadows of the Established Male Dynastic Centerpiece, and made her a unique, exotic figure in her own right. It gave her her own story, in her own way.

Barbara Gordon was always a highly-intelligent character with a photographic memory. That was there from her introduction. Ostrander's genius was in using the crippling injury imposed by another writer to refocus the character on that intellect.

As a front-line fighter, Barbara was a B-List character, and her chosen nom de guerre insured that she'd remain there, as "Batman's Girl Sidekick". As Oracle, she's A-List. The idea of Barbara Gordon leading the Justice League only makes sense after 20 years of seeing her as Oracle. Batgirl was no leader, and showed no signs of developing into one. As a kick-fighter, she was playing catch-up to people with more training, more motivation, and more special "edges" than she would ever have. It took Ostrander's re-emphasis of the character according to her unique strengths that allowed her to become the formidable presence she is today.

Taking that away from her would be crippling the character. Frankly, if Barbara got the use of her legs back (without time-travel trickery), I'd be utterly disappointed if she gave up being Oracle. She's done far more good that way that she ever would as one more high-heeled boot to a bad guy's face.

(Okay, if she got healed and put the costume on again strictly because she was offered leadership of the JLA, I could buy it.)

And you know what? "Oracle" only works as an ex-crimefighter. Putting some random person hospitalized by violence into the chair and behind the keyboard just doesn't have the emotional impact.

Finally... I'm hardly a fan of the school that insists that a superhero has to have some driving trauma, but I've got to admit, Oracle has a lot more solid motivation than the librarian who took a few judo classes and started crimefighting for fun.